Quick answer
A finance health check should test whether reporting is timely, cash is forecast, profitability drivers are understood, working capital is controlled, forecasts are updated, controls are reliable, systems are efficient, responsibilities are clear, external requirements are anticipated and finance supports decisions.
Key takeaways
- A finance health check tests visibility, control, efficiency and decision support - not just compliance.
- Timely reporting and forward-looking cash forecasts are core indicators of finance maturity.
- Controls, systems and team responsibilities should evolve as the business grows.
- The review should end with a prioritised roadmap rather than a long list of observations.
Finance Director lens
From a Finance Director perspective, a health check should separate symptoms from causes. Slow reporting, weak cash visibility and manual spreadsheets may all originate from a small number of process, data or accountability gaps.
A finance function can appear busy and still leave management exposed. The purpose of a finance health check is not to create another audit. It is to assess whether finance is giving the business the visibility, control and decision support required for its current stage of growth.
1. Do we receive reliable monthly numbers quickly enough?
Timeliness matters because a report that arrives too late cannot influence decisions. Ask how many working days the close takes, which reconciliations create delays and how many adjustments are made after the first version of management accounts.
2. Can we see our cash position 13 weeks ahead?
A business should understand upcoming customer receipts, payroll, supplier payments, tax, debt service and major discretionary spend. The forecast will never be perfect, but management should know where liquidity could tighten and what actions are available.
3. Do we know what actually drives our profitability?
Overall gross margin can hide large differences by customer, product, location or project. Management should know which drivers matter and whether pricing decisions reflect the full cost to serve. If profitability analysis is only available once a year, finance is not yet supporting commercial decisions effectively.
4. Are receivables, inventory and payables actively managed?
Review overdue receivables, slow inventory and supplier terms. Look for recurring disputes, unbilled work, ageing stock and payment practices that do not match the operating cycle. Working capital should be managed through operational actions, not simply monitored in month-end reports.
5. Do we have a forecast that changes when the business changes?
The annual budget is not enough. Ask when the forecast was last updated and whether it incorporates new contracts, hiring, price changes, capex and working-capital assumptions. Management should be able to explain the latest expected full-year outcome and why it differs from the original plan.
6. Are key financial controls proportionate to our size?
Controls do not need to be bureaucratic. At minimum, responsibilities for payments, bank access, journal approval, customer credit, vendor setup and sensitive data should be clear. Growth often creates control gaps because processes that worked with ten employees are still being used with one hundred.
7. Are finance systems reducing work or creating it?
Look for repeated manual downloads, rekeying, spreadsheet reconciliations and duplicate data. The right question is not whether the business has an ERP, but whether information flows reliably from operations to finance and whether management can obtain consistent reports without excessive manual intervention.
8. Does everyone know what the finance team is responsible for?
Unclear roles create gaps and duplicated work. Define ownership of close, cash forecasting, collections, budgeting, tax coordination, reporting and business partnering. Then identify which tasks require senior judgement and which can be standardised or automated.
9. Are we ready for the next bank, investor, audit or Board request?
External requests often reveal weaknesses. Can the company quickly produce current management accounts, forecasts, debt schedules, covenant calculations, KPI definitions and supporting analyses? If every request becomes a fire drill, finance needs better preparation and information architecture.
10. Does finance help management make decisions?
This is the most important question. Finance should not only report outcomes; it should help evaluate pricing, hiring, capex, expansion, financing and risk. If management receives numbers but still makes major decisions without financial analysis, the function has not yet become a true business partner.
What should happen after the health check?
Do not produce a long list of weaknesses with no priorities. Classify actions by impact and urgency. Some issues can be fixed quickly through clearer responsibilities or reporting changes. Others may require systems, process redesign or additional leadership. The objective is a practical roadmap that improves decision-making without over-engineering the finance function.
A good finance function should make the business easier to manage. If these ten questions are difficult to answer, that is useful information in itself.
How often should a finance health check be repeated?
For a stable SME, a structured review may be useful annually or before a major strategic event. Faster-growing companies may revisit the framework more frequently because systems, headcount and funding needs can change quickly. A bank refinancing, acquisition, new market entry, ERP project or leadership transition is also a natural trigger for a fresh review.
The important point is not the frequency of a formal exercise. Management should convert the highest-priority questions into ongoing routines. Cash forecasting, management reporting, working-capital review and forecast updates should become part of the operating cadence. A health check is most valuable when it leads to better habits, not when it becomes another report stored in a folder.
Owners should also expect the review to identify what is already working well. The purpose is not to criticise the finance team; it is to decide where the next dollar of effort will create the most value. A balanced review protects strong processes while concentrating attention on genuine gaps.
Common questions
Is a finance health check the same as an audit?
No. An audit focuses on financial statements and assurance. A finance health check is a management review of reporting, cash flow, controls, systems, processes and decision support.
Bring the Numbers Into the Decision
Sivora Paige provides senior, hands-on finance leadership for growing SMEs and founder-led businesses, with specialist depth in maritime and shipping.
Let's Have a Conversation